. Introduction
In Poland, the first six plant species were placed under strict protection in 1919, and in 1946, the first species protection ordinance listing 110 plants was issued. The Ministry of the Environment’s regulation issued on October 9, 2014 (Journal of Laws, 2014), is currently in effect. A total of 415 species (including 270 seed plants) are strictly protected and 301 species (including 121 seed plants) are partially protected.
There are two basic strategies for preserving plant genomic reserves: in situ and ex situ conservation. Plants can be protected outside of their native habitats with a gene bank through traditional methods such as field collection, seed banks, and botanical gardens, as well as in vitro techniques using micropropagation and storage cultures. Many centers have tissue culture laboratories for the multiplication of plants that are difficult to propagate by conventional horticultural techniques.
Tissue culture permits mass production of cloned plants. Plants obtained in vitro can be of great value for research, living collections, and plant reintroduction programs if considered appropriate. Different morphogenetic pathways such as organogenesis, that is, the multiplication of shoots from axillary buds, the formation of adventitious organs, and somatic embryogenesis are used for in vitro production of native, protected, partly protected, endangered, critically endangered, and extinct species.
Australia is an example of a country that has successfully used in vitro cultures to protect endangered plant species for years (Ashmore et al., 2011). This country is currently implementing the Threatened Species Strategy 2021–2031 (Australian Government, 2021).
In vitro techniques were suggested for ex situ propagation of native endangered plant species in Poland for the first time by Professor Krystyna Kukułczanka from the Botanical Garden of the University of Wrocław. His paper, entitled “The role of in vitro cultures in the conservation of rare and threatened plant species” (Kukułczanka, 1987), referenced a seminar that took place ten years earlier in the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, England. At that time, the important role of tissue cultures in the protection and preservation of plant species that are difficult to reproduce using traditional methods was indicated. The author emphasized that plants could be multiplied in vitro by initiating a culture from a small number of seeds, organs, or tissues, and the resulting cultures could be maintained under optimal conditions for a long time and serve as tissue banks.
Currently, biotechnological methods based on in vitro techniques are being used as plant protection tools for various purposes. The most important are vegetative reproduction in vitro and protection of the morphogenetic potential of cells, tissues, and organs (Rybczyński & Mikuła, 2006).
For almost 30 years, Polish scientists from universities, research institutes, and botanical gardens have been working on developing micropropagation protocols for endangered species in Poland. However, only a few species of Polish flora are protected using in vitro techniques. The number of endangered plant species is growing, hence, propagation studies must be intensified in the near future and all possible techniques must be combined to cover various aspects of biodiversity protection.
The aim of this study is to review the most significant achievements of Polish scientists in the application of in vitro culture and biotechnology for the protection of native taxa. There are ten notable research institutions in Poland involved in this field, including eight academic centers and two botanical gardens (Table 1). These research centers investigate the possibilities of employing in vitro and biotechnological techniques to protect the endangered species native to Poland.
Table 1
Institution | Plant species |
---|---|
University of Agriculture in Krakow | Leucojum vernum, Lilium maratagon, Cypripedium calceolus, Dactylorhiza maculate, Epipactis helleborine, Goodyera repens, Gymnadenia conopsea, Biscutella laevigata, Gentiana pneumonanthe, Hepatica nobilis, Primula farinose, Staphylea pinnata, Daphne cneorum |
University of Gdańsk | Drosera anglica, Cypripedium calceolus, Dactylorhiza majalis, Epipactis atrorubens, Epipactis palustris, Orchis morio |
Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń | Carlina onopordifolia, Cirsium pannonicum, Inula germanica, Leontopodium alpinum, Taraxacum pieninicum |
Poznań University of Medical Sciences | Eryngium maritimum, Eryngium alpinum, Eryngium planum, Linnaea borealis, Rubus chamaemorus |
Botanical Garden of the University of Wrocław | Asplenium adulterinum, Asplenium cuneifolium, Drosera intermedia, Drosera rotundifolia |
Polish Academy of Sciences Botanical Garden – CBDC* | Osmunda regalis, Lilium maratagon, Gentiana cruciate, Gentiana punctata |
Jagiellonian University | Pulsatilla vulgaris, Viola ulginosa, Viola stagnina |
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań | Matteucia struthiopteris, Osmunda regalis |
University of Life Sciences in Lublin | Aldrovanda vesiculosa, Salix lapponum |
Warsaw University of Life Sciences | Daphne mezereum |
The achievements presented in this study include fern and monocotyledon species (Table 2), herbaceous dicotyledons (Table 3), and several woody species (Table 4).
Table 2
Plant species | Initial explants | Morphogenetic pathway | Plant acclimatization* | Cytometric/Molecular analysis* * | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
FERNS | |||||
Asplenium adulterinumAsplenium cuneifolium | spores | in vitro spore germination, gametophytes and sporophytes obtained | + | – | Marszał-Jagacka et al., 2005 |
Matteucia struthiopteris | rhizomes, dormant buds from rhizomes | indirect organogenesis | - | - | Zenkteler, 2006 |
Osmunda regalis | spores | gametophyte cultures, young sporophytes, saprophyte production | - | - | Zenkteler, 1999; Makowski et al., 2016 |
MONOCOTYLEDONOUS | |||||
Amaryllidaceae family | |||||
Leucojum vernum | scales, leaves from bulbs, ovaries and fruits | indirect somatic embryogenesis | - | CA | Ptak, 2010 |
Liliaceae family | |||||
Lilium maratagon | seedling explants, adventitious bulblet scales | organogenesis, indirect somatic embryogenesis | - | CA | Rybczyński & Gomolińska, 1989; Kędra & Bach, 2005; Pawłowska et al., 2007 |
Orchidaceae family | |||||
Cypripedium calceolus | seeds, capsules, young ovaries | seedling growth protocorm-like bodies obtained | - | - | Znaniecka & Łojkowska, 2004; Pindel & Pindel, 2004 |
Dactylorhiza maculata | capsules, young ovaries | protocorms, protocorms with shoots and roots development | - | - | Pindel & Pindel, 2004 |
Dactylorhiza majalis | seeds | seedling growth | - | - | Znaniecka & Łojkowska, 2004 |
Epipactis atrorubens Epipactis palustris | seeds | - | |||
Epipactis helleborine Goodyera repens Gymnadenia conopsea | capsules, young ovaries | indirect organogenesis | - | - | Pindel & Pindel, 2004 |
Orchis morio | seeds | seedling growth | - | - | Znaniecka & Łojkowska, 2004 |
Table 3
Species | Explants | Morphogenetic pathway | Plant acclimatization* | Cytometric/Molecular analysis* * | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Herbaceous plants | |||||
Asteraceae family | |||||
Carlina onopordifolia | shoot tips from seedlings | organogenesis: axillary shoot multiplication and rooting | - | - | Trejgell et al., 2012a |
Cirsium pannonicum | shoot tips from seedlings | organogenesis: axillary shoot multiplication and rooting | + | - | Trejgell et al., 2012b |
Inula germanica | shoot tips from seedlings, fragments of cotyledons, hypocotyls and roots | organogenesis: adventitious shoot induction, multiplication and rooting | + | - | Trejgell et al., 2018 |
Leontopodium alpinum | shoot tips from seedlings, fragments of cotyledons, hypocotyls and roots | organogenesis: axillary and adventitious shoot proliferation and rooting | - | - | Trejgell et al., 2010 |
Taraxacum pieninicum | shoot tips from seedlings | organogenesis: axillary bud proliferation, synthetic seed production and storage in slow growth conditions | - | - | Kamińska et al., 2021 |
Apiaceae family | |||||
Eryngium maritimum Eryngium alpinum Eryngium planum | apical and axillary buds | organogenesis: multiplication and rooting of shoots | + | CA | Kikowska et al., 2014; Kikowska et al., 2020; Thiem et al., 2013 |
Brassicaceae family | |||||
Biscutella laevigata | in vitro shoots | organogenesis: shoot multiplication | + | - | Muszyńska et al., 2017 |
Droseraceae family | |||||
Drosera anglica | leaf segments | direct organogenesis | - | - | Kawiak et al., 2003 |
Drosera intermedia Drosera rotundifolia | seeds | seed germination and seedling growth, storage in slow growth conditions | - | - | Kukułczanka & Cząstka, 1987; Kukułczanka et al., 1991 |
Aldrovanda vesiculosa | shoot fragments | organogenesis: shoot multiplication | - | - | Parzymies, 2021 |
Gentianaceae family | |||||
Gentiana pneumonanthe | seeds | direct organogenesis: axillary shoot multiplication, somatic embryogenesis, synthetic seeds | - | CA | Pawłowska & Bach, 2003; Bach & Pawłowska, 2003; Bach et al., 2004 |
Gentiana cruciata | seedlings | somatic embryogenesis | - | - | Mikuła & Rybczyński, 2001; Mikuła et al., 2005a,b |
Gentiana punctata | zygotic embryos | somatic embryogenesis | - | - | Mikuła et al., 2004 |
Primulaceae family | |||||
Primula farinosa | seedlings | organogenesis: axillary shoot cultures and rooting | + | CA | Sitek et al., 2020 |
Ranunculaceae family | |||||
Hepatica nobilis | seedlings | somatic embryogenesis | + | - | Szewczyk-Taranek & Pawłowska, 2015 |
Pulsatilla vulgaris | seedlings | somatic embryogenesis (direct and indirect), organogenesis - adventitious shoot, rooting | + | CA, ISSR | Żabicka et al., 2021 |
Violaceae family | |||||
Viola uliginosa | fragments of leaf and petiole | organogenesis (direct and indirect), shoot rooting | + | CA, AFLP | Ślązak et al., 2015 |
Viola stagnina | fragments of leaf and petiole | organogenesis (direct and indirect) | + | CA, ISSR | Żabicki et al., 2019, 2021 |
Table 4
Species | Explants | Morphogenetic pathway | Plant acclimatization* | Cytometric/Molecular analysis* * | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Caprifoliaceae family | |||||
Linnaea borealis | nodal segments and shoot tips with apical meristems | organogenesis: shoot multiplication on solid and liquid media, rooting | - | CA | Thiem et al., 2021 |
Rosaceae family | |||||
Rubus chamaemorus | shoot tips | organogenesis: shoot multiplication, rooting | + | CA | Thiem, 2021; Thiem & Śliwińska, 2003 |
Salicaceae family | |||||
Salix lapponum | shoots | organogenesis: shoot multiplication, rooting | + | CA, ISSR | Parzymies et al., 2020 |
Staphyleaceae family | |||||
Staphylea pinnata | dormant buds | organogenesis: axillary shoot propagation | - | - | Szewczyk-Taranek & Pawłowska, 2016 |
Thymelaeceae family | |||||
Daphne mezereum | axillary shoots | organogenesis: shoot multiplication, rooting | - | ISSR, RAPD | Pacholczak & Nowakowska, 2019; Nowakowska & Pacholczak, 2020 |
Daphne cneorum | in vitro roots | root cultures, tolerance to Thielaviopsis basicola | - | - | Hanus-Fajerska et al., 2014 |
This study does not include cryopreservation. Detailed information on cryopreservation was presented by Mikuła et al. (2022).
. Endangered national ferns and monocotyledons propagated by tissue culture
In vitro cultures of the native ferns Asplenium adulterinum, Asplenium cuneifolium (Marszał-Jagacka et al., 2005) and Osmunda regalis (Zenkteler, 1999; Makowski et al., 2016) were initiated by spore germination, which is the most common method for this group of plants. Attempts have also been made to grow Matteucia struthiopteris cultures from rhizomes and dormant buds on rhizomes and to induce callus formation and proliferation (Zenkteler, 2006). The mineral salt content of the medium plays a significant role in fern in vitro culture. For the growth of A. adulterinum and A. cuneifolium gametophytes, half strength nutrient Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium was used (Murashige & Skoog, 1962; Marszał-Jagacka et al., 2005). Similarly, in research carried out in the Botanical Garden in Powsin, reducing the content of mineral salts in the MS medium to half or even a quarter had a positive effect on the proliferation of gametophytes Osmunda regalis. The maximum sporophyte production in this fern requires 1/8 MS mineral salts (Makowski et al., 2016). M. struthiopteris in vitro culture could be initiated in the Modified Fern Multiplication Medium (Miller & Murashige, 1976).
The reviewed publications indicate that in vitro techniques have been used to protect the greatest number of Orchidaceae species to date, even though only two papers published in 2004 investigated the species mentioned here. The development of protocols for protocorm culture and further plant regeneration for native orchid species is particularly challenging. Pindel & Pindel (2004) initiated cultures of five orchid species from green capsule sections. Znaniecka & Łojkowska (2004) established the cultures of five other native orchid species by focusing mainly on the observations of seedling germination and development. Both teams worked on Cypripedium calceolus; but the most advanced development of protocorms with shoots and roots was achieved in Dactylorhiza maculata (Pindel & Pindel, 2004). MS medium supplemented with naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 6-benzyl-aminopurine (BAP), and activated charcoal was the best medium for the development of protocorms (Pindel & Pindel, 2004). In contrast, media containing peptone, yeast extract, and casein hydrolysate were the most effective for germination and development of orchid seedlings (Znaniecka & Łojkowska, 2004).
However, Polish scientists have rarely investigated bulbous plants plants. The first research results on the induction of adventitious bulbs in Lilium martagon were published over 30 years ago by Rybczyński & Gomolińska (1989). They cultured bulb scales as explants in MS medium containing NAA and BAP. Significant progress in the propagation of bulbous plants was made at the University of Agriculture in Krakow, where the protocols for adventitious organogenesis and indirect somatic embryogenesis were developed for Leucojum vernum and L. martagon, thus considerably increasing their propagation rate (Kędra & Bach, 2005; Ptak, 2010). In L. martagon, the formation of adventitious bulbs was observed in seedling bulb explants on MS medium in absence of plant growth regulators or in the presence of BAP. The best explants for embryogenic callus initiation were adventitious bulb scales in L. martagon and fruit tissues in L. vernum. The medium for culture initiation, callus propagation, and somatic embryo induction of L. martagon and L. vernum was enriched with 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram) and BAP. The abscisic acid and polyethylene glycol added to the medium stimulated somatic embryo maturation in L. vernum (Table 2).
. Endangered national dicotyledon herbaceous species and woody plants propagated by tissue culture
In the case of dicotyledonous species, the research mostly involved herbaceous species, 21 of which belonged to eight botanical families. Woody plants were represented by only six species belonging to five families (Tables 3 and 4).
Drosera species are among the first protected herbaceous plants propagated in vitro. The study was initiated by Professor Kukułczanka (Kukułczanka & Cząstka, 1987) and continued by researchers from the University of Gdańsk (Kawiak et al., 2003).
The in vitro cultures of Drosera are usually initiated from seeds, but also, more rarely, from leaf fragments (Kawiak et al., 2003). The seeds of the protected taxa are easily available, their harvesting does not destroy the mother plants, and furthermore, the seed-initiated culture contributes to maintaining the species variability and biological diversity. In vitro cultures of many other herbaceous taxa have been established from seeds and seedling fragments and used for further propagation. Such procedures have been implemented for species belonging to the Asteraceae family, for example, Carlina onopordifolia, Cirsium pannonicum, Inula germanica, Leontopodium alpinum, Taraxacum pieninicum, from the Gentianaceae family (e.g., Gentiana pneumonanthe), Primulaceae family (e.g., Primula farinosa or Hepatica nobilis), and from the Ranunculaceae family (Pulsatilla vulgaris) (Table 3). In some taxa of herbaceous plants, such as Eryngium maritimum (Kikowska et al., 2014), Eryngium alpinum (Kikowska et al., 2020), Viola uliginosa (Ślązak et al., 2015), Viola stagnina (Żabicki et al., 2019, 2021), and all investigated tree taxa (except for Rubus chamaemorus, which was initiated from seeds), the cultures were initiated from vegetative explants (dormant buds) (Table 4). The most recent advances within this family involved the successful application of nanosilver to maintain sterility in Aldrovanda vesiculosa cultures (Parzymies, 2021).
The micropropagation of protected and endangered plants is mainly based on organogenesis, and research has focused primarily on determining the influence of growth regulators on shoot multiplication and in vitro rooting. The research also focused on the selection of micro- and macro-elements in the nutrient medium; for example, the medium according to Reinert and Mohr (1967) was the best for Drosera rotundifolia seedling development (Kukułczanka & Cząstka, 1987) and the liquid Fast medium (Fast, 1981) was the best for the proliferation of Drosera anglica shoots (Kawiak et al., 2003).
In contrast, in studies on C. onopordifolia, the MS medium was modified by replacing ferric ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid (FeEDTA) with ethylenediamine di-2-hydroxy-phenyl acetate ferric acid (Fe-EDDHA). These modifications had no effect on the rate of axillary shoot proliferation, but they enhanced leaf chlorophyll content (Trejgell et al., 2012a).
In addition to MS medium, in vitro propagation of woody plants has also been achieved on QL medium (Quoirin & Lepoivre, 1977) and Woody Plant Medium (WPM) (Lloyd & McCown, 1980) for Staphylea pinnata (Szewczyk-Taranek & Pawłowska, 2016) and WPM medium for Daphne mezereum (Nowakowska & Pacholczak, 2020).
During axillary shoot multiplication of S. pinnata, the identification and elimination of endophytic bacterial contamination was studied. VITEK®;2, a rapid bacterial identification system, and the 16S rRNA gene sequencing method allowed for the identification of Acinetobacter johnsonii strain ATCC 17909 and Methylobacterium rhodesianum strain DSM 5687. The addition of gentamicin to the medium was the most effective in eliminating bacteria (Szewczyk-Taranek et al., 2020).
The cultures were maintained under fluorescent white light. Szewczyk-Taranek et al. (2017) showed that LED light may be an alternative light source for the in vitro shoot proliferation stage of S. pinnata (Szewczyk-Taranek et al., 2017).
To protect endangered plants, Polish researchers have also used the process of somatic embryogenesis for plant propagation. This process was used by Mikuła and Rybczyński (2001) in Gentiana cruciata, and by Bach and Pawłowska (2003) in G. pneumonanthe. Plantlet regeneration from somatic embryos was achieved in both studies. Supplementation of MS medium by 2,4-D (dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) was a key factor for somatic embryogenesis induction. In G. cruciata, embryogenic callus formation was observed in seedlings (best performance on hypocotyl and cotyledonous seedlings, 39–46 somatic embryos were formed per explant). In G. pneumonanthe, the explants were leaves or apical meristems derived from shoots multiplied in vitro (25–37% of the explants formed embryogenic callus). Additionally, embryogenic callus in marsh gentians were observed in media containing picloram. Embryo development was possible after lowering the auxin level in the culture medium, and maturation occurred in the media without growth regulators.
Moreover, Mikuła et al. (2005a) demonstrated the huge potential of embryogenic suspension cultures of G. cruciata for the long-term mass production of somatic embryos. Somatic embryogenesis was also performed in two species of the Ranunculaceae family. Żabicka et al. (2021) used shoot tips of P. vulgaris seedlings to obtain embryogenic callus and somatic embryos. A method for secondary somatic embryogenesis was developed for H. nobilis (a species protected since 2004) embryos derived from embryogenic callus formed on seedlings. The most efficient repetitive cyclic process of secondary somatic embryogenesis was observed in MS medium without growth regulators (on 78–87% primary somatic embryos), and the best rate of somatic embryo germination was achieved in MS medium with BAP (52%) (Szewczyk-Taranek & Pawłowska, 2015).
The final stage of micropropagation of protected plants is acclimatization. In vitro regenerated plants of C. pannonicum (Trejgell et al., 2012b), E. maritimum (Kikowska et al., 2014), H. nobilis (Szewczyk-Taranek & Pawłowska, 2015), I. germanica (Trejgell et al., 2018), P. farinosa (Sitek et al., 2020), P. vulgaris (Żabicka et al., 2021), R. chamaemorus (Thiem, 2001), V. stagnina (Żabicki et al., 2019), V. ulginosa (Ślązak et al., 2015) and Salix lapponum (Parzymies et al., 2020) were successfully acclimatized to greenhouse conditions. Studies of plant adaptation to ex vitro conditions in a greenhouse also included observations of plant performance in the field (e.g., for Biscutella laevigata) (Muszyńska et al., 2017).
. Selected achievements of biotechnological research
Experiments on G. pneumonanthe (Bach et al., 2004), T. pieninicum (Kamińska et al., 2021) and E. alpinum (Kikowska et al., 2020) have investigated the possibility of storing plant material in the form of synthetic seeds. Sodium alginate coatings were used for lateral shoot tips derived from gentian, cloudberry, and eryngo propagated in vitro and for shoot tips taken from dandelion seedlings germinated in vitro.
In vitro cultures have also been used to investigate the protected plants with respect to their resistance to fungal pathogens, such as Thielaviopsis basicola attacking Daphne cneorum (Hanus-Fajerska et al., 2014), or tolerance to heavy metals such as Pb and Cd (B. laevigata) (Muszyńska et al., 2017).
To assess the usefulness of the micropropagation protocol for species protection, it is important to test the genetic stability of the regenerated plants. This is typically performed using molecular markers and flow cytometry. Recently, the genetic stability of the in vitro regenerated plants was analyzed using the following markers: inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) in S. lapponum, D. mezereum, V. stagnina and P. vulgaris; randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) in D. mezereum; and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) in V. uliginosa (Ślązak et al., 2015; Nowakowska & Pacholczak, 2020; Parzymies et al., 2020; Żabicki et al., 2019, 2021). Cytometric analysis of the regenerated plants was performed for E. maritimum (Kikowska et al., 2014), E. alpinum (Kikowska et al., 2020), G. pneumonanthe (Bach & Pawłowska, 2003), L. vernum (Ptak, 2010), L. martagon (Kędra & Bach, 2005; Pawłowska et al., 2007), Linnaea borealis (Thiem et al., 2021), P. farinosa (Sitek et al., 2020), P. vulgaris (Żabicka et al., 2021), R. chamaemorus (Thiem & Śliwinska, 2003), S. lapponum (Parzymies et al., 2020), V. uliginosa (Ślązak et al., 2015) and V. stagnina (Żabicki et al., 2019). Majority of the studies found no differences between in vitro regenerated plants and mother plants, indicating that the developed micropropagation protocols are suitable for use. In some cases, as suggested by Ślązak et al. (2015), more direct methods are preferred for micropropagation, even when the process is less effective. The authors showed that the genetic uniformity of the regenerated V. uliginosa plants with the mother plants, as detected by AFLP analyses, clearly depended on the type of organogenesis.
Notably, biotechnological research also focuses on the use of in vitro cultures of protected species as a source of therapeutically important substances. For this purpose, various types of in vitro cultures have been performed (e.g., shoot, callus, root, and suspension cultures), and various treatments have been used to stimulate the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (Kikowska et al., 2022). This issue has been discussed in a separate publication (Pietrosiuk et al., 2022).
. Conclusion
Although studies on the implementation of in vitro multiplication and conservation procedures for protected plant species are actively carried out in Poland, they are concerned only with a small percentage of endangered species of the Polish flora. As the number of endangered plant species is constantly increasing, these studies should be intensified in the future. However, this claim has considerable limitations. First, the protected species come from various botanical families, and the development of micropropagation procedures is highly individualized and, therefore, a slow process. Second, due to a lack of legal regulations in Poland on plants propagated in vitro, the reintroduction of such species is not common.
Despite the wide range of possibilities provided by well-equipped laboratories and experienced researchers in Poland, the potential of in vitro cultures for biodiversity conservation has not been fully utilized. Currently, the use of in vitro cultures is usually restricted to storing plant material in in vitro gene banks and long-term storage under in vitro conditions. Future studies should focus on using in vitro cultures as a source of explants stored in liquid nitrogen (cryopreservation).