ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Figure from article: Adaptive Velocity PSO-Based...
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This study proposes an adaptive velocity particle swarm optimization (AVPSO) technique for tuning the proportional-integral (PI) controllers of a permanent magnet DC (PMDC) motor drive system in light electric vehicles (LEVs). The AVPSO algorithm adaptively adjusts the inertia weight and acceleration coefficients to improve convergence and balance between exploration and exploitation during the optimization process. A MATLAB/Simulink model is used for offline evaluation of the cost function, which penalizes steady-state and transient errors in angular velocity and armature current. Simulation results show that the AVPSO-based tuning achieves faster settling times reduced by 15.6% in forward and 2.1% in reverse operation while eliminating steady-state errors observed in classical PSO. Performance comparisons under four-quadrant operation and torque disturbance scenarios confirm the method’s effectiveness in improving control accuracy, reducing power losses, and maintaining system stability. These results demonstrate the potential of AVPSO as a robust and efficient tool for optimizing motor drive performance in LEV applications. Overall, the AVPSO-based optimization provides a robust and efficient solution for optimizing motor drive systems in LEVs.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research is a direct outcome of an internal project (INSE2521), conducted at the Interdisciplinary Research Center for Sustainable Energy Systems (IRC-SES), King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia. The authors sincerely appreciate the support and resources provided by the IRC-SES, which contributed significantly to the successful completion of this work.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
D. Rimpas, S. D. Kaminaris, D. D. Piromalis, G. Vokas, K. G. Arvanitis, and C.-S. Karavas, “Comparative Review of Motor Technologies for Electric Vehicles Powered by a Hybrid Energy Storage System Based on Multi-Criteria Analysis,” Energies, vol. 16, p. 2555, 2023.
 
2.
A. Eldho Aliasand and F. T. Josh, “Selection of Motor foran Electric Vehicle: A Review,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 24, pp. 1804–1815, 2020/01/01/ 2020.
 
3.
A. Joseph Godfrey and V. Sankaranarayanan, “A new electric braking system with energy regeneration for a BLDC motor driven electric vehicle,” Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, vol. 21, pp. 704–713, 2018/08/01/ 2018.
 
4.
A. Isah, A. Mohammed, and A. Hamza, “Electric Power-Assisted Steering: A Review,” in 2019 2nd International Conference of the IEEE Nigeria Computer Chapter (NigeriaComputConf), 2019, pp. 1–6.
 
5.
E. Sangeetha and V. Ramachandran, “Different topologies of electrical machines, storage systems, and power electronic converters and their control for battery electric vehicles—a technical review,” Energies, vol. 15, p. 8959, 2022.
 
6.
T. Sutikno, N. R. N. Idris, and A. Jidin, “A review of direct torque control of induction motors for sustainable reliability and energy efficient drives,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 32, pp. 548–558, 2014/04/01/ 2014.
 
7.
W. Słowik, P. Pi ˛ atek, T. Dziwi´nski, and J. Baranowski, “Selected current sensing circuits for motor control application,” Pomiary Automatyka Robotyka, vol. 21, 2017.
 
8.
Z. Bitar, A. Sandouk, and S. Al Jabi, “Testing the performances of DC series motor used in electric car,” Energy Procedia, vol. 74, pp. 148– 159, 2015.
 
9.
N. M. Morris and N. M. Morris, “DC Machines,” Electrical Principles III, pp. 44–63, 1978.
 
10.
E. Soressi, “New life for old compound DC motors in industrial applications?,” in 2012 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES), 2012, pp. 1–6.
 
11.
Y. S. Chang, Y. C. Luo, and P. C. Shih, “AIR: Agent and Ontology-Based Information Retrieval Architecture for Mobile Grid,” in 2008 IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference, 2008, pp. 650– 655.
 
12.
M. Onda, M. Misawa, T. Kojima, N. Aya, A. Seto, and T. Yamane, “A stratospheric LTA stationary platform for telecommunication and environmental protection,” in SICE ’99. Proceedings of the 38th SICE Annual Conference. International Session Papers (IEEE Cat. No.99TH8456), 1999, pp. 1227–1232.
 
13.
W. Xu, M. M. Ismail, Y. Liu, and M. R. Islam, “Parameter optimization of adaptive flux-weakening strategy for permanentmagnet synchronous motor drives based on particle swarm algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 34, pp. 12128–12140, 2019.
 
14.
M. M. Ismail, M. Al-Dhaifallah, H. Rezk, H. U. Rahman Habib, and S. A. Hamad, “Optimizing battery discharge management of PMSM vehicles using adaptive nonlinear predictive control and a Generalized Integrator,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal, p. 103169, 2024/11/19/ 2024.
 
15.
Y. Yu, Y. Pan, Q. Chen, Y. Hu, J. Gao, Z. Zhao, et al., “Multi- Objective Optimization Strategy for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Based on Combined Surrogate Model and Optimization Algorithm,” Energies, vol. 16, p. 1630, 2023.
 
16.
L. Kong, H. Zhang, T. Zhang, J. Wang, C. Yang, and Z. Zhang, “Adaptive Control Parameter Optimization of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors Based on Super-Helical Sliding Mode Control,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, p. 10967, 2024.
 
17.
H. Xu, J. Zhang, J. Liu, Y. Cao, and A. Ma, “Optimization of Ship Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor ADRC Based on Improved QPSO,” Applied Sciences, vol. 15, p. 1608, 2025.
 
18.
G. Yuan, Y. Tao, S. Bozhko, P. Wheeler, T. Dragicevic, and C. Gerada, “Neural Network aided PMSM multi-objective design and optimization for more-electric aircraft applications,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 35, pp. 233–246, 2022.
 
19.
C. Sun, F. Wen, W. Xiong, H. Wang, and H. Shang, “Multiobjective comprehensive teaching algorithm for multi-objective optimisation design of permanent magnet synchronous motor,” IET Electric Power Applications, vol. 14, pp. 2564–2576, 2020.
 
20.
M. M. Ismail, W. Xu, X. Wang, A. K. Junejo, Y. Liu, and M. Dong, “Analysis and optimization of torque ripple reduction strategy of surfacemounted permanent-magnet motors in flux-weakening region based on genetic algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 57, pp. 4091–4106, 2021.
 
21.
N. Pragallapati, T. Sen, and V. Agarwal, “Adaptive Velocity PSO for Global Maximum Power Control of a PV Array Under Nonuniform Irradiation Conditions,” IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, vol. 7, pp. 624–639, 2017.
 
22.
M. P. Aghababa, A. M. Shotorbani, and R. M. Shotorbani, “An Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization Applied to Optimum Controller Design for AVR Power Systems,” International Journal of Computer Applications, vol. 11, pp. 22–29, 2010.
 
23.
X. Li, K. Mao, F. Lin, and X. Zhang, “Particle swarm optimization with state-based adaptive velocity limit strategy,” Neurocomputing, vol. 447, pp. 64–79, 2021.
 
24.
A. R. Jordehi, “A review on constraint handling strategies in particle swarm optimisation,” Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 26, pp. 1265–1275, 2015.
 
25.
M. S. Innocente and J. Sienz, “Constraint-handling techniques for particle swarm optimization algorithms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.10933, 2021.
 
26.
A. M. Sharaf and A. A. A. El-Gammal, “A novel Particle Swarm Optimization PSO tuning scheme for PMDC motor drives controllers,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Power Eng., Energy and Electr. Drives, 2009, pp. 134–139.
 
27.
P. G. Medewar and R. K. Munje, “PSO-based PID controller tuning for PMDC motor,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Energy Systems and Applications (ICESA), 2015, pp. 522–526.
 
28.
K. G. Abdulhussein, N. M. Yasin, and I. J. Hasan, “Comparison of cascade P-PI controller tuning methods for PMDC motor based on intelligence techniques,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. (IJECE), vol. 12, p. 1, 2022.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top