ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Effects of Urban Comfort on a Heterogeneous Labor Force
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Economics and Management, Shandong Huayu University of Technology, China
Submission date: 2025-05-07
Final revision date: 2025-07-24
Acceptance date: 2025-08-20
Publication date: 2025-08-20
Corresponding author
XILIN ZHANG
Department of Economics and Management, Shandong Huayu University of Technology, China
Journal of Undergraduate Research International 2025;1(1):1-7
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In China, the labor market is undergoing profound structural shifts in both supply and demand. As the economy transitions from high-speed to high-quality development, new competencies are required of the workforce. In this study, we used a microlevel perspective to examine the drivers of labor mobility. By integrating principal component analysis and the entropy weight method, we constructed a composite index for urban livability, theorized its role in shaping heterogeneous labor migration, and empirically tested these relationships using a conditional logit model. The analysis is based on 1% of the national population sample surveys conducted from 2000 to 2015, along with corresponding urban characteristics. The findings reveal that urban livability significantly influences destination choice, and there are notable variations between worker groups. Policy recommendations include enhancing urban livability to attract talent, tailoring recruitment strategies to local labor demands, and reforming the hukou (residency registration) system to reduce access barriers. This study offers theoretical and practical insights into how urban environments affect the mobility decisions of diverse labor populations.
REFERENCES (14)
1.
Clark, D. (2004). Urban world/global city. Routledge.
2.
Scully, G. W. (1969). Interstate wage differentials: A cross section analysis. The American Economic Review, 59(5), 757–773.
3.
Zhao, W., & Li, F. (2007). The Mobility of Heterogeneous Labor and Regional Income Disparities: An Extended Analysis Based on the New Economic Geography Model. Chinese Journal of Population Science, (01), 27–35, 95.
4.
Sun, X. (2013). Heterogeneous Labor and Labor Mobility in China: An Analysis Based on New Economic Geography. Chinese Journal of Population Science, (03), 36–45.
5.
Wang, X. L., & Fan, G. (2004). Trends and Determinants of Regional Disparities in China. Economic Research Journal, (01), 33–44. Tabuchi T, Thisse JF. Taste heterogeneity, labor mobility and economic geography [J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2002, 69(1): 155–177.
6.
Zhang, H. F., Zhang, J. Z., & Yao, X. G. (2019). Spatial Evolution of Housing Costs and Their Impact on Labor Mobility Decisions in China. Economic Geography, 39(07), 31–38.
7.
Tiebout CM. A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1956, 64(5):416–424.
8.
Graves, P. E., & Linneman, P. D. (1979). Household migration: Theoretical and empirical results. Journal of urban economics, 6(3), 383–404.
9.
Zhang, Y. L., & Fang, Q. Y. (2019). The Impact of Urban Livability on Labor Mobility. China Population, Resources and Environment, (3), 118–125.
10.
Glaeser, E. L., Kolko, J., & Saiz, A. (2001). Consumer city. Journal of economic geography, 1(1), 27–50.
11.
Diamond, R. (2016). The determinants and welfare implications of US workers’ diverging location choices by skill: 1980–2000. American economic review, 106(3), 479–5.
12.
Diamond, R. (2016). The determinants and welfare implications of US workers’ diverging location choices by skill: 1980–2000. American economic review, 106(2), 479–524.
13.
Florida, R. (2020). The New Urban Crisis. Basic Books.
14.
Gennaioli, N., La Porta, R., Lopez De Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2014). Growth in regions. Journal of Economic growth, 19(2), 259–30.