The effect of nut shell addition on the permeability of a crushed gold ore
| 1 | Department of Mining Engineering, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, 67100, Zonguldak, Turkey |
| 2 | Department of Mineral Proccessing, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak 34468 İstanbul, Turkey |
| 3 | Department of Civil Engineering, Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, 67100, Zonguldak, Turkey |
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Serdar Yilmaz
Bulent Ecevit University, Bülent Ecevit Universitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Maden, Mühendisliği Bölümü İncivez/Merkez, 67100 Zonguldak, Turkey
Bulent Ecevit University, Bülent Ecevit Universitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Maden, Mühendisliği Bölümü İncivez/Merkez, 67100 Zonguldak, Turkey
Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2018;54(2):467–475
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In this study, variations in permeability of a gold ore by nut shell addition was studied. Ore particle size, nut shell size and volume fraction in the ore were the parameters investigated. Permeability is an important issue in heap leach operations considering the processing duration. Particularly below 6 mm particle size permeability is greatly hampered. Turkey is the leading country in the world in hazelnut production. Therefore, considerable amounts of nut shell are obtained as a by-product. Incerase in the permeability of a finely crushed ore will obviously enable an increase in the leaching efficiency. The finer the particle size the more the liberation of gold is yet the permeability is lower. Therefore, this study focuses on the possibility of improving the permeability of ore heaps with nut shell addition. Optimum amount of nut shell which should be added to the ore was found to be 5% by volume. It was found that the permeability of ore crushed below 2.36 mm considerably increased by the addition of nut shell below 18 mm.
REFERENCES (17)
1.
ASTM D2434 Standard Test Method for Permeability of Granular Soils (Constant Head) Designation: D2434−68 (Reapproved 2006).
2.
BOUFFARD S.C., 2005. Review of agglomeration practice and fundamentals in heap leaching. Mineral Processing& Extactive Metall. Rev. 26: 233-294.
3.
BREITENBACH A.J., 2005. Heap leach pad design and construction practices in the 21st Century. Vector Colorado LLC. 1-9.
4.
CORELAB., 1983. Chapter 2-Porosity New Mexico Tech. University Petroleum Engineering Department Accessed (July 2017) through the website : (URL:http://infohost.nmt.edu/~petro...) (Last Modified August 26 2010).
5.
ECHEVERRIA N., ROMO D., SUAZO I., 2015 Hydraulic performance of a permanent heap leach with intermediate drainage system. Proceedings of Heap Leach Solutions, September 14-16, 2015, Reno, Nevada, USA.
6.
KAWATRA S.K., EISELE T.C., LEWANDOWSKI K.A., GURTLER J.A., 2006 Novel Binders and Methods for Agglomeration of Ore. Semiannual Technical Progress Report,.
8.
KINARD D.T., SCHWEIZER A.A., 1987. Engineering properties of agglomerated ore in a heap leach pile. Chapter 10, Geotechnical Aspects of Heap Leach Design, Ed. Dirk van Zyl, 55–64.
9.
LEWANDOWSKI K.A., KAWATRA S.K., 2009. Binders for heap leaching agglomeration. Minerals and Metallurgical Processing Vol. 26 No.1, 1-24.
10.
LASTRA M.R., CHASE C.K., 1984 Permeability, solution delivery and solution recovery: critical factors in dump and heap leaching of gold. Min. Eng., 36 (11),1537-1539.
11.
LUPO J., DOLEZAL A., 2010 Ore geotechnical testing for heap leach pads design. In Organizing Committee (Eds.), Tailings and Mine Waste 2010, the 14th International Conference on Tailings and Mine Waste CRC Press. 91–99.
12.
MCCLELLAND G.E., 1986. Agglomerated and unagglomerated heap leaching behavior is compared in production heaps. Mining Engineering. 38(7): 500-503.
13.
MILCZAREK M., YAO T., BANERJEE M., KELLER J., 2013. Ore permeability methods of evaluation and application to heap leach optimization. Heap Leach Solutions Vancouver. Canada (2013) 403-415.
14.
MILLER G., 2003. Ore geotechnical effects on copper heap leach kinetics, Hydrometallurgy. Fifth International Conference in Honour of Professor Ian Ritchie, Vol. 1: Leaching and Solution Purification, (C. A. Young et al., Ed.), The Minerals: Metals & Materials Society, 329–342.
16.
UHRIE J.L., WILTON L.E., ROOD E.A., PARKER D.B., GRIFFIN J.B., LAMANNA J.R., 2003. The metallurgical development of the Morenci MFL project, Vol. VI-Hydrometallurgy of Copper (Book 1), Copper 2003-Cobre 2003, (P. A. Riveros et al., Eds.), Santiago, Chile, 29–37.
17.
VETHOSODSAKDA T., 2012. Evaluation of crushed ore agglomeration, liquid retention capacity, and column leaching. Master’s thesis, Department of Metallurgical Engineering, University of Utah.
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.