Evaluation of flotation reagents by normalization procedures
Jan Drzymala 1  
 
More details
Hide details
1
Wroclaw University of Science and Technology
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Jan Drzymala   

Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Na Grobli 15, - Wrocław, Poland
 
Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2018;54(1):182–192
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Froth flotation is a dynamic multiphase process in which particulate matter is separated with the help of chemical reagents by gas bubbles immersed in water. The original flotation results are usually presented in the form of kinetic curves relating recovered particulate matter mass (yield ) or mass of a selected component (recovery ), both shortly denoted as y, versus process time t at different concentrations c (g/dm3) of the applied reagents. The kinetic curves can be modified into three: incentive (maximum yield or recovery ymax vs c), limits (ymax vs kinetic constant k or specific rate) and half-life of flotation (t1/2 vs c) curves. The original and modified curves can be normalized by taking into account either an external parameter such as molecular mass (MW), critical coalesce concentration (CCC), critical concentration at the minimum bubble velocity (CMV), dynamic foaming index (DFI), and many other parameters or an internal parameter such as time, concentration needed to achieve certain yield, recovery (y) or kinetic constant. Normalization leads to new flotation curves and provides additional useful information about flotation performance. Normalization can be fully effective, partial or ineffective. Normalization of the original flotation kinetic curves usually is ineffective. Also, normalization of the incentive curve with external parameters such as frother molecular mass, which changes reagent concentration from c (g/dm3) to C (mol/dm3), is also ineffective. Partially effective are normalizations with other external parameters such as CCC and CMV, usually within the same class of regents, for instance alcohols. Only DFI seems to be a universal external normalization parameter for flotation results because it provides fully effective normalization and thus predicts the flotation results. Limited data on DFI restrict a full verification of this hypothesis. Normalization of the modified flotation curves with internal parameters such as k50 (value of 1st order kinetic constant when recovery or yield is 50% after a given flotation time), Ct1/2 (frother concentration in mol/dm3 at which the flotation half-life has an arbitrarily chosen value) and cy75 (frother concentration in g/dm3 at which recovery or yield is 75% after a given flotation time) is a good base for practical classification of flotation reagents.
 
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Bhattacharya S., Dey S., 2008. Evaluation of frother performance in coal flotation: a critical review of existing methodologies, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, 29(4), 275-298.
 
2.
Czarnecki, J., Malysa, K., Pomianowski, A., 1982. Dynamic frothability index. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 86(2), 570–572.
 
3.
Drzymala, J., 2007. Mineral Processing. Foundations of theory and practice of minerallurgy, 1st English Edition. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wroclawskiej, Wroclaw.
 
4.
Drzymala, J., Kowalczuk, P. B., 2017., Classification of flotation frothers, sumitted to Minerals Engineering.
 
5.
Drzymala, J., Ratajczak, T., Kowalczuk, 2017. Kinetic separation curves based on process rate considerations, Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 53(2), 2017, 983−995.
 
6.
Fuerstenau M.C., Jameson G.J., Yoon R-H., 2007. Froth flotation: A century of innovation. SME Inc., Littleton.
 
7.
Gaudin, A.M., 1957. Flotation, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., New York.
 
8.
Khoshdast, H., Mirshekari, S., Zahab-Nazouri, A.2015. A model for predicting dynamic frothability value for dual-frother blends, Journal of Mining and Environment, 6(1), 119-124.
 
9.
Klimpel, R.R. and Hansen, R.D., 1988. Frothers, in: Reagents in Mineral Technology, P. Somasundaran and B.M. Moudgil Eds, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 387-409.
 
10.
Kowalczuk, P.B., 2013. Determination of critical coalescence concentration and bubble size for surfactants used as flotation frothers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52(33), 11752–11757.
 
11.
Kowalczuk, P.B., Buluc, B., Sahbaz, O., Drzymala, J., 2014. In search of an efficient frother for pre-flotation of carbonaceous shale from the Kupferschiefer stratiform copper ore. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 50(2), 835–840.
 
12.
Kowalczuk, P.B., Zawala, J., Kosior, D., Drzymala, J., Malysa, K., 2016. Three-phase contact formation and flotation of highly hydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene in the presence of increased dose of frothers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 55(3), 839–843.
 
13.
Kowalczuk, P. B., Zawala, J., Drzymala J., 2017. Concentration at the minimum bubble velocity (CMV) for various types of flotation frothers, Minerals, 7 (118), 1-15.
 
14.
Kudlaty, T., 2016. Maximum size of floating particles of copper-bearing shale in the presence of frothers. BSc thesis (P.B. Kowalczuk-supervisor), Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland.
 
15.
Laskowski J., 1998, Frothers and frothing, in: Frothing in Flotation II, J.S. Laskowski, E.T. Woodburn (eds.), Gordon and Breach, Australia, 1–49.
 
16.
Laskowski, J.S., 2004. Testing flotation frothers. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 38, 13–22.
 
17.
Malysa K., Czubak-Pawlikowska J., Pomianowski A., 1978. Frothing Properties of Solutions and their Influence on the Floatabaility, Proc. 7th Int. Congress Surface Active Substances, Moscow, Vol. 3, pp. 513-520.
 
18.
Malysa, E., Malysa, K., Czarnecki, J., 1987. A method of comparison of the frothing and collecting properties of frothers. Colloids and Surfaces 23, 29–39.
 
19.
Melo, F., 2005. Fundamental properties of flotation frothers and their effect on flotation, Master thesis, the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
 
20.
Nowak, J., Drzymala, J., 2017. Flotacja łupka miedzionosnego w obecnosci spieniacza, zbieracza oraz depresora w postaci dekstryny, in: Lupek miedzionosny II, P.B Kowalczuk and J. Drzymała (Eds), WGGG PWR, 118-128.
 
21.
Wills, B.A., Finch, J.A., 2016. Wills' Mineral Processing Technology, 8th Ed., An introduction to the practical aspects of ore treatment and mineral recovery. Elsevier Ltd, Amsterdam.
 
22.
Zhang W., Nesset, J.E., Rao, R., Finch, J.A., 2012. Characterizing frothers through critical coalescence concentration (CCC95)-hydrophile-lipophile balance (HLB) relation, Minerals, 2, 208-227.
 
eISSN:2084-4735
ISSN:1643-1049