PL EN
Review form
 
Title of the reviewed article:

1. Compliance of the title with a subject of the article: fully consistent, partially consistent, not consistent

2. Evaluation of the content and substance (including the accuracy of terminology). The article in this aspect is: excellent, good, fair poor

3. The evaluation of the originality of a topic and the scientific values. The article in this aspect is:
excellent, good, fairpoor

4. Evaluation of the logic reasoning and methods of argumentation. The article in this aspect is:
excellent, good, fair poor

5. The evaluation of a composition, layout and language of a paper. The article in this aspect is:
excellent, good, fair poor

6. The evaluation of the used sources. The article in this aspect is: excellent, good, fair poor

7. General assessment. The article is: excellent, good, fair poor

8. Conclusion:
a. The article is eligible for publication in a scientific journal without any changes - I recommend it for publication in the quarterly „Studia Humanistyczne AGH”
b. The article is eligible for publication in a scientific journal after implementation of minor changes and amendments – I recommend it for publication in the quarterly „Studia Humanistyczne AGH”.
c. The article is eligible for publication in a scientific journal after implementation of numerous major changes and amendments – I do not recommend it for publication in the quarterly „Studia Humanistyczne AGH” in this form.
d. The article is not eligible for publication in a scientific journal – I do not recommend it for publication in the quarterly „Studia Humanistyczne AGH”

9. Suggested changes