PL EN
Does time allocation matter in promotion decisions? – case study of women managers in Aptiv Krakow Tech Center
 
More details
Hide details
1
Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Wydział Zarzadzania i Komunikacji Społecznej, Instytut Ekonomii, Finansów i Z arzadzania
2
Aptiv, Kraków
Publication date: 2019-12-30
 
Studia Humanistyczne AGH 2019;18(4):45–58
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Each day people make decisions regarding work-life balance, and these decisions impact many aspects of their lives, including career paths. In our article we point towards the relation between time and professional careers. There are more men than women in higher managerial positions and we inquire if time allocation matters when men and women choose to accept promotion or not. We start with a literature review regarding these issues, followed by empirical studies. The empirical studies have a twofold character. First, we conduct analysis of time-use data, and then we present the case study of managers in Aptiv Krakow Tech Center. As a result of the conducted studies, it seems that time is a constraint especially for women, although in terms of the stories of individual managers it is not evident as a universal barrier.
 
REFERENCES (32)
1.
Anxo, Dominique, Lennart Flood, Letizia Mencarini, Ariane Pailhé, Anne Solaz & Maria Letizia Tanturri. 2007. Time Allocation between Work and Family over the Life-Cycle: A Comparative Gender Analysis of Italy, France, Sweden and the United States. IZA Discussion Papers No. 3193, pp. 1-35.
 
2.
Bonke, Jens, Mette Deding, Mette Lausten & Leslie S. Stratton. 2008. Intrahousehold Specialization in Housework in the United States and Denmark, “Social Science Quarterly”, 89 (4): 1023-1043.
 
3.
Brockmann, Hilke, Anne-Maren Koch, Adele Diederich, & Christofer Edling. 2018. Why Managerial Women are Less Happy Than Managerial Men, “Journal of Happiness Studies”, 19: 755-779.
 
4.
Central Statistical Office. 2015. Time Use Survey 2013, Warszawa.
 
5.
Cha, Youngjoo. 2010. Reinforcing Separate Spheres: The Effect of Spousal Overwork on Men’s and Women’s Employment in Dual-Earner Households, “American Sociological Review”, 75 (2): 303-329.
 
6.
Cha, Youngjoo. 2013. Overwork and the persistence of gender segregation in occupations, “Gender & Society”, 27 (2): 158-184.
 
7.
Esquivel, Valeria. 2011. Sixteen Years After Beijing: What Are New Policy Agendas for Time-Use Data Collection?, “Feminist Economics”, 17(4): 215-238.
 
8.
Esquivel, Valeria, Debbie Budlender Nancy Folbre & Indira Hirway. 2008. Explorations: Time Use Surveys in the South. “Feminist Economics”, 14 (3): 107-152.
 
9.
Folbre, Nancy & Julie A. Nelson. 2000. For Love or Money – or Both?, “Journal of economic perspectives”, 14 (4): 123-140.
 
10.
Gálvez-Muñoz, Lina, Paula Rodríguez-Monroño & Mónica Domínguez-Serrano. 2011. Work and Time Use by Gender: A New Clustering of European Welfare Systems. “Feminist Economics”, 17(2): 125-157.
 
11.
Hesketh, Beryl. 2000. Time Perspective in Career-Related Choices: Application of Time-Discounting Principles, “Journal of Vocational Behavior”, 57: 62-84.
 
12.
Hewitson, Gillian J. 2003. Domestic labour and gender identity: are all women carers?, in: Drucilla K. Barker & Edith Kuiper (ed.), Towards a Feminist Philosophy of Economics, London, New York: Routledge, pp. 266-284.
 
13.
Hirway, Indira. 2010. Time Use Surveys in Developing Countries: An Assessment, in: Rania Antonopoulos & Indira Hirway (eds), Unpaid Work and the Economy: Gender, Time Use and Poverty in Developing Countries. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp.252-324.
 
14.
Hochschild, Arlie. 1989. The second shift. Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.
 
15.
Hozer-Koćmiel, Marta. 2010. Statystyczna analiza podziału czasu i wartości pracy kobiet, in: Wybrane zagadnienia gospodarowania i zarządzania w pracach doktorskich obronionych na Wydziale Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania, Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania, 20, Szczecin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, pp. 69-84.
 
16.
Hsee, Christopher K., Reid Hastie & Jingqiu Chen. 2008. Hedonomics: Bridging decision research with happiness research, “Perspectives on Psychological Science”, 3 (3): 224-243.
 
17.
Humphries, Jane. 1998. Towards a Family-Friendly Economics. “New Political Economy”, 3 (2): 223-240.
 
18.
Jacobs, Jerry A. & Kathleen Gerson. 2004. The time divide: Work, family, and gender inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
 
19.
Kuhn, Peter, & Ferdinando Lozano. 2008. The expanding workweek? Understanding trends in long work hours among U.S. men, 1979-2006. “Journal of Labor Economics” 26: 11-43.
 
20.
Linehan, Margaret, and Walsh, James S. 2000. Work-family conflict and the senior female international manager, “British Journal of Management”, 11 (s1): S49-58.
 
21.
Lynch, Kathleen, John Baker & Maureen Lyons. 2009. Affective Equality: Love, Care and Injustice, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
 
22.
McDowell, Linda. 2001. Father and Ford revisited: gender, class and employment change in the new millennium. “Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers”, 26 (4): 448-464.
 
23.
Moore, Gwen. 2004. Mommies and daddies on the fast track in other wealthy nations, “The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences”, 596 (1): 208-213.
 
24.
OECD. 2015. OECD Employment Outlook 2015, Paris: OECD Publishing.
 
25.
Pasqua, Silvia & Anna Laura Mancini. 2012. Asymmetries and interdependencies in time use between Italian parents, “Applied Economics”, 44 (32): 4153-4171.
 
26.
Simpson, Ruth. 1998. Presenteeism, power, and organizational change: long hours as a career barrier and the impact on the working lives of women managers. “British Journal of Management”, 9 (s1): 37-50.
 
27.
Sirianni, Carmen & Cynthia Negrey. 2000. Working Time as Gendered Time. “Feminist Economics” 6(1): 59-76.
 
28.
Titkow, Anna, Danuta Duch-Krzysztofek & Bogusława Budrowska. 2003. Unpaid women’s labour – myths, realities, perspectives. Warsaw: IFiS PAN (Titkow, A., Duch-Krzysztofek, D. & Budrowska, B. (2003). Niepłatna praca kobiet – mity, realia, perspektywy. Warszawa: IFiS PAN).
 
29.
World Bank (1995). Towards Gender Equality. The Role of Public Policy. Washington D.C.
 
30.
Wóycicka, Irena. 2009. Model of care in Poland. In Irena E. Kotowska (ed.), Structural and cultural conditions of women’s labour participation in Poland. Warsaw: Scholar. (Wóycicka, I. (2009). Model opieki w Polsce. In I.E. Kotowska (ed.), Strukturalne i kulturowe uwarunkowania aktywności zawodowej kobiet w Polsce. Warszawa: Scholar).
 
31.
Zachorowska-Mazurkiewicz, Anna & Katarzyna Mroczek. 2015. Time Allocation and the Life Cycle of Women and Men in Poland, in: Susan Moore (ed.), Contemporary Global Perspectives on Gender Economics. Hershey: IGI Global, pp. 292-313.
 
32.
Zaroda-Dąbrowska, Anna & Tomasz Dąbrowski. 2018. Kobieta i kariera. Analiza barier w awansie kobiet liderek, “Personel Plus”, no. 1: 72-77.
 
ISSN:2084-3364