Cites 2016

Comparison of grinding characteristics in high-pressure grinding roller (HPGR) and cone crusher (CC)

Lei Liu 1, 2, 3,  
Qi Tan 1, 2, 3  ,  
Lu Liu 1, 2, 3,  
Wenjun Li 1, 2, 3,  
Liang Lv 1, 2, 3
Zhengzhou Institute of Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources CGS
Key Laboratory for Polymetallic Ores' Evaluation and Utilization
China National Engineering Research Center for Utilization of Industrial Minerals
Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2017;53(2):1009–1022
Publish date: 2017-05-07
We comparatively studied the ball mill grinding characteristics of comminuted hematite products using a high-pressure grinding roll (HPGR) and a conventional cone crusher (CC). The major properties, including grinding kinetics and technical efficiency (Et), were investigated. The parameters in m-th order grinding kinetics were analyzed, and grinding specific rates were visualized. Ore particles experienced three inherent stages in ball grinding mills, that is i) rapid grinding of coarse fraction, ii) dynamic grinding of medium size fraction, and iii) single grinding of medium size fraction. Particles with size -0.043+0.031 mm were used into dynamic grinding stage earlier than particles -0.105+0.043 mm, and then over-grinding of fines occurred easily. Compared with CC products, HPGR products had significantly shorter turning time points in three breakage stages, implying that HPGR products were ground faster with earlier occurrence of fines over-grinding. HPGR products gave lower Et at a decreasing rate than the CC products for -2.0 mm and -0.5 mm feeds. Then, it showed a slightly higher value of Et for -2.0+0.5 mm feed. This indicated that fines over-grinding in HPGR full-size products were more serious under the condition of coarse grinding, whereas the efficiency was higher, and over-grinding weakened significantly in HPGR coarse products because of screening-out fines.
Qi Tan   
Zhengzhou Institute of Multipurpose Utilization of Mineral Resources CGS, No.328 Longhai Road, Zhongyuan District, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China, 450006 Zhengzhou, China
1. ABOUZEID, M., FUERSTENAU, W., 2009, Grinding of mineral mixtures in high-pressure grinding rolls, International Journal of Mineral Processing 93, 59-65.
2. ACAR, C., HOSTEN, C, 2013. Grinding kinetics of steady-state feeds in locked-cycle dry ball milling, Powder Technology 249, 274-281.
3. AUSTIN, L. G., SHOJI, K., BELL, D., 1982, Rate equations for non-linear breakage in mills due to material effects, Powder Technology 31, 127-133.
4. DUAN, X. X., 1991, Selective grinding and its applications, Metallurgical Industry Press, Beijing, 52.
5. DUAN, X. X., 2012, Crushing and grinding (3rd ed.), Metallurgical Industry Press, Beijing, 135-136.
6. FUERSTENAU, D.W., ABOUZEID, A.Z.M., PHATAK, P.B., 2010, Effect of particulate environment on the kinetics and nergetic of dry ball milling, International Journal of Mineral Processing 97, 52–58.
7. FUERSTENAU, D.W., KAPUR, P.C., 1995, Newer energy-efficient approach to particle production by comminution, Powder Technology 82, 51-57.
8. GAO, Y., GAO, Z., SUN, W., HU, Y., 2016, Selective flotation of scheelite from calcite: A novel reagent scheme. International Journal of Mineral Processing 154, 10-15.
9. HAN, Y. X., LIU, L., YUAN, Z. T., WANG, Z., ZHANG, P., 2012, Comparison of low-grade hematite product characteristics in a high pressure grinding roller and jaw crusher, Mineral & Metallurgical Processing 29, 75-80.
10. LAPLANTE, A.R., FINCH, J.A., VILLAR, R. D., 1987, Simplification of grinding equation for plant simulation, Trans. Instn. Min. Metall. (Sect. C: Mineral Process. Extr. Metall.) 96, 108-112.
11. MAXTON, D., MORLEY, C., BEARMAN, R., 2003, A quantification of the benefits of high pressure rolls crushing in a operating environment, Minerals Engineering 16, 827-838.
12. VAN DER MEER, F. P., GRUENDKEN, A., 2010, Flowsheet considerations for optimal use of high pressure grinding rolls, Minerals Engineering 23, 663-669.
13. NORGATE, T.E., WELLER, K.R., 1994, Selection and operation of high pressure grinding rolls circuits for minimum energy consumption, Minerals Engineering 7, 1253-1267.
14. RAMIREZ-CASTRO, J., FINCH, J.A., 1980, Simulation of a grinding circuit change to reduce lead sliming, CIM Bull 73, 132-139.
15. SCHNONERT, K., 1988, A first survey of grinding with high-compression roller mills, International Journal of Mineral Processing 22, 401–412.
16. VIZCARRA, T.G., WIGHTMAN, E.M., JOHNSON, N.W., MANLATIG, E.V., 2010, The effect of breakage mechanism on the mineral liberation properties of sulphide ores, Minerals Engineering 23, 374-382.
17. WANG, J., GAO, Z., GAO, Y., HU, Y., SUN, W., 2016, Flotation separation of scheelite from calcite using mixed cationic/anionic collectors. Minerals Engineering 98, 261-263.
18. WILLS, B. A., NAPIER, T. J., 2006, Mineral processing technology (Seven Edition), Elsevier Science & Technology Books, Queensland, 90, 96-97,146.